In politics, the loudest declaration of confidence sometimes comes at the moment a political structure is facing its most uncomfortable questions. Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State may insist that all is well within his political family, but the growing list of prominent departures from his camp raises questions that cannot simply be dismissed as opposition propaganda.
Makinde, through his media aide, Sulaimon Olarenwaju, has denied reports that he convened emergency meetings following the defection of several political heavyweights from the Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM) to the All Progressives Congress (APC). He has also dismissed suggestions that his political structure is crumbling ahead of the 2027 governorship election.
Fair enough. Political defections are not necessarily evidence of a collapsing government. Politicians change parties for different reasons, ranging from ideological disagreements to personal ambitions and calculations about political survival.
However, when the departures involve former commissioners, political advisers, former government officials, grassroots mobilisers and influential party stakeholders, dismissing them as ordinary political movements may be an exercise in political optimism.
Among those who have reportedly moved to the APC are Segun Ogunwuyi, a former Chief of Staff to Makinde, alongside several influential figures from Ogbomoso Zone. Their departure is particularly significant because political loyalty is often tested not when a government is popular, but when the interests of influential stakeholders begin to diverge.
Beyond the defections, resignations within the administration have added another dimension to the unfolding political drama. The departures of Commissioner for Budget and Economic Planning Ayobami Ojo, Simeon Oyeleke and other officials deserve attention, especially as the state approaches another politically sensitive period.
The question, therefore, is not whether Makinde held emergency meetings. The bigger question is whether his political house is experiencing internal disagreements that could affect its electoral fortunes.
His administration may point to infrastructure development, workers’ welfare, healthcare, education and economic reforms as evidence of its achievements. These are important considerations. But governance performance and political loyalty are two different things. A governor can perform well and still experience disagreements within his political family.
Similarly, defections do not automatically translate into electoral victory for the receiving party. The APC must understand that welcoming prominent politicians is different from winning the confidence of ordinary voters.
For Makinde, the challenge is to demonstrate that his political influence extends beyond the personalities who occupy strategic positions around him. A genuinely strong political movement should survive disagreements, accommodate competing interests and maintain grassroots confidence.
As 2027 approaches, Oyo State is becoming another interesting theatre of Nigeria’s political calculations. The APC sees an opportunity, while Makinde’s camp insists that its foundation remains intact.
But elections are not won through press statements, political boasting or the number of defectors displayed at party ceremonies.
Ultimately, the people of Oyo State will decide whether Makinde’s political structure remains a fortress or whether the cracks being reported today will become tomorrow’s electoral disadvantage.
In politics, the real strength of a political structure is not measured by how many people declare loyalty when the going is good, but by how many remain when the political winds change direction.
About The Author
